Wes Clark in a Washington Monthy article entitled "Broken Engagement": This dream of engineering events in the Middle East to follow those of the Soviet Union has led to an almost unprecedented geostrategic blunder. One crucial reason things went wrong, I believe, is that the neoconservatives misunderstood how and why the Soviet Union fell and what the West did to contribute to that fall. They radically overestimated the role of military assertiveness while underestimating the value of other, subtler measures. They then applied those theories to the Middle East, a region with very different political and cultural conditions. The truth is this: It took four decades of patient engagement to bring down the Iron Curtain, and 10 years of deft diplomacy to turn chaotic, post-Soviet states into stable, pro-Western democracies. To achieve the same in the Middle East will require similar engagement, patience, and luck. "
Friday, May 21, 2004
Previous Posts
- Bill Gates comes out in support of blogging: "What...
- DSBPI has - for about two years - thought that Tom...
- Who is the ad wizard that came up with this one: A...
- DSBPI Entrepreneur in Residence has suggested star...
- Another challenge to machines' ability to sort dat...
- I am the CIO of DSBPI and I have decided to junk o...
- How relevant is knowledge with turbo-powered searc...
- Note to future doctors dreaming of standing on the...
- The NYT reports that a Panel Urges New Protection ...
- If you like Clancy, you'll love Hersh: The New Yor...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home